It would be a pretty safe statement to say that most people aren’t too concerned about what is in their food. So it’s no big surprise that there was a possible contamination of 17 brand name food and beverages with mercury, and no public outrage. Part of the reason is that the claims of contamination have been thoroughly denied by the CRA (Corn Refiners Association), who claim that the information raised against them is shaky at best. The entire thing has become one large bickering contest, and it seems as if people are losing sight of the big picture.
First off, what is mercury? Mercury is an element which at room temperature and pressure, is a liquid metal. While it looks very neat, I assure you that you don’t want to be close enough to it to enjoy it. In high enough quantities it is highly toxic to humans and can cause a variety of damage to your body. There is a degree of mercury found naturally in fish, but most people don’t need to worry about this unless they are eating a lot more fish than average. Needless to say, mercury isn’t something I would be excited to hear about being found in my food.
It’s understandable that the CRA wishes to defend themselves in the public eye, that they don’t want to look like people who can’t even keep contaminates out of their product. This does not outweigh, however, their obligation to keep the consumer safe. By this I mean; at the point when a group has spent enough time to make a study, you should at least acknowledge the possibility of contamination, and look into it. If it turns out that the study was false, then that’s what you can announce to everyone. What I’m reading in this article is that they aren’t even considering the possibility that they are wrong.
Filed under: Food, Reading Response, Spring 2010 | Tagged: Food/ Enviroment, Reading Response, Spring 2010 | Leave a Comment »